Welcome to the Williams Family Blog!

Now that you have found us, we invite you to return often for more adventures!


We Came To Play!

We Came To Play!

Opening Magic Kingdom

Opening Magic Kingdom
Showing posts with label Condé Nast Traveler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Condé Nast Traveler. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

We Bought A New Suitcase



What happens when you have 5 suitcases that don’t have wheels?  You buy more luggage, that's what you do.  

We have several large bags that have lots of mileage on them and throughout our trips have lost most, if not all of their wheels.  And, what good is a suitcase with just one wheel?

So, the husband and I had been looking. . . not shopping per say, but looking for some suitcases that might replace our others.

There was a second hand charity auction that had a black suitcase up for bid and we placed a low bid.  No luck.  Not too disappointed as it the bag didn't meet all of the criteria. . . see below.

We looked on-line and at a variety of stores.

Then, on Sunday, when we were roaming around a large metropolitan area while the boy and his Uncle John took in a minor league baseball game, we came across a bag that we liked.

First criteria—the wheels had to be built into the body of the bag.  We had learned through experience that the farther out the wheels stick, the more likely they are to get broken when you check your bag. 

Interestingly, there were others that were checking out the four wheeled bags that could spin 360° so I made sure our conversation about broken wheels got a bit louder.  It worked.  A lady made her way over with a suitcase in hand and asked what we were saying about the wheels.  We explained about wheels being broken when checking bags.  I also showed her how the wheels extending from a carry-on bag could keep her bag from fitting in the overhead bin.

Second criteria—the bag had to be lightweight.  Again, our new suitcase met the criteria.  The husband did some testing with a suitcase in each hand and compared the weights.  The one we picked was lighter.  And, lightweight was in the title of the bag.  If I only get 50 pounds, I don’t want 10 of those pounds going to the bag itself. 

Third criteria—a double barred handle.  Single barred handles can break easily.  Again, the bag we picked had a double bar.  It even had a zipper compartment for the handle when it retracted back into the bag and was not in use.

Fourth criteria—it had to be any color other than black.  This is more of a personal choice due to the number of black bags that can be found on luggage carousels.  Currently, we have pink, red, and purple luggage just to give you an idea of color preference.  Our new bag is a moss green/gray/red combo.  The husband said we had to jazz it up a bit.  I’m not sure what he has in mind, but I did hear him mention ribbons.

Fifth criteria—it had to be sturdy.  We double checked the zippers, hinges, etc.  Then, we took the bag for a test drive around the store while we continued to shop to test out durability and maneuverability. 

Six criteria—it had to not be expensive.  Conde Nast Traveler’s July 2012 edition included a special report about why 26 million airline bags go missing each year.  The article also included advice about luggage, etc.  One tip was to never pay more than $150 for a bag.  Well, that would be our top end!  Our new suitcase was less than $80.

As soon as we paid for it and took it to the car I said to the husband, “You know what I want to do now don’t you?”  He replied, “Pack?”  That was exactly right!

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Disney Cruise Line Fleet Tops Condé Nast Traveler's List of Best Cruise Ships




The February 2012 Condé Nast Traveler announced the 100 Best Cruise Ships in the World and Disney ships take the 3 of the top 4 slots in the Large Cruise Ship category.  And with only 3 ships in the fleet as of right now, every Disney ship made the list!

Large Cruise Ships
Overall Score
Itineraries/ Schedules
Shore Excursions
Disney Magic
90.7
92.3
84.9
Celebrity Eclipse
88.8
83.2
68.3
Disney Dream
88.8
81.1
79.1
Disney Wonder
88.8
86.3
79.4

The Disney Magic had the highest Overall Score and the top score for Shore Excursions based on votes from cruisers.  A summer in Europe most likely helped to boost ratings in this category as well as Itineraries and Schedules. 

The Disney Dream did not fare so well in the Itineraries and Schedules category, most likely due to the limitations of the Bahamian 3, 4, and 5 night cruises with stops in Nassau and Castaway Cay.



Large Cruise Ships
Crew/Service
Cabins
Food/Dining
Disney Magic
96.0
90.4
84.7
Celebrity Eclipse
93.7
96.9
90.6
Disney Dream
90.7
92.6
88.9
Disney Wonder
95.6
90.4
84.1

The Magic topped out the charts for Crew and Service, especially compared to the Disney Dream.  A new and inexperienced crew on their first 6 month tour is most likely the reason.  We experienced this while sailing on the Dream in July.  Interestingly, most of the crew members we spoke with, from Entertainment to Wait Staff to Housekeeping, said that they were planning to jump ship to the Fantasy.  Most stated reasons such as more tips due to the longer itinerary and the Entertainment staff would have more time off;  instead of a show 4 out of 5 nights, it would be a show 4 out of 7 nights.  So, will the Dream eventually get a seasoned and experienced crew?

The Dream did come out ahead in the Cabins category.  Those inside virtual portholes are a guest favorite.  Demand for inside staterooms on the Dream has outweighed demand for outside staterooms, which is unusual in the cruise industry.  The newness of the staterooms most likely adds value to this category.

Disney had ho-hum scores for dining with the Dream edging out the other Disney ships.  The newly themed Animator’s Palate is most likely a contributor, but was not our favorite while on board—click here to read more.  The addition of Remy to the adults only restaurant selection of Palo on the Dream gives the Dream an edge in the dining category. 


Large Cruise Ships
Activities/ Facilities
Design/ Layout
Number of Passengers
Disney Magic
92.7
94.0
2,700
Celebrity Eclipse
89.7
95.3
2,850
Disney Dream
96.3
90.7
4,000
Disney Wonder
91.8
93.4
2,700


The Disney Dream sailed past the competition in Activities and Facilities.  The Aqua Duck, Goofy’s Sports Deck, Interactive play floors in the children’s areas, and an expanded character meet and greet list are most likely the reasons behind the Dream’s competitive edge.  The Disney Fantasy with even more water features will give the Dream a run for its money by next year in this category.

Where the Dream fell short was in Design and Layout.  I’m sensing the Dream’s awkward deck layout with the inability to traverse the ship fore to aft on any deck lowers the score in this category.  Our stateroom was on Deck 5 and we had great access to elevators and the ability to traverse the ship on our side.  Guests on the other side of the ship would have had to use our side or the stairs to get to the rest of Deck 5 or Deck 4.  With the addition of a main dining restaurant, Enchanted Garden, on Deck 2, guests had to use the midship elevators or staircase to get to the restaurant.  Only Decks 3 and 4, along with the top decks 6 through 11 provided guests adequate access to the entire ship without using the stairs.  Also, the aft elevators being located in the middle of Cabanas, a restaurant, may feel a bit strange.  Let’s see how the Disney Fantasy fares in this category.

As a Disney Cruise Line fan, it is no surprise to see the fleet make it to the top of the list for Best Large Cruise Ships.  Disney Cruise Line has a way of exceeding expectations and has one of the biggest return cruiser rates of any cruise line.

When the cruise industry is being looked at with a more critical eye due to the recent Costa Concordia tragedy, it is great to hear and read some good news about cruising.  Reports are that booking rates for the industry are down about 10% and cancelations are running about the same.  With 19 million cruisers sailing the high seas this past year, our family looks to be part of those numbers in 2012.